Schwinn varsity.

On August 14, 2015 10:21:05 AM PDT, Bob W-PDML <p...@web-options.com> wrote:
>On 14 Aug 2015, at 16:32, Malcolm Smith <rrve...@virginmedia.com>
>wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Some time ago I was asked how to find out what weight a cycle would
>take by
>> two of my friends, who were overweight. They were both tall and
>suspected
>> they may have to lose weight first. As cycling is low impact exercise
>on
>> joints, I thought it made sense for them to cycle as soon as
>possible,
>> especially as you see improvement quickly. I lost 30Kg myself in 2010
>by
>> adding cycling for an hour or to my day for six months and cutting
>out
>> snacks. 
>
>That's very impressive. I've found that cycling 6-7 hours a day across
>France has a similar effect and you still get to eat snacks :0) 
>
>> [...]
>> 
>> Most good quality metal frames (Reynolds 501 and above with the
>exception of
>> 753) will have a top end weight of 125Kg. Many metal framed mountain
>bikes
>> are about the same, but don't expect to do anything other than normal
>easy
>> cycling at the top limit. [...]
>
>I'd have thought a decent mountain bike would take more than that,
>given the stresses involved in dropping off a mountain. Something with
>29er wheels would also probably suif a tall person better than 26"
>wheels.
>
>> 
>> Many cargo bikes take 150Kg (and in fact my friends bought two of
>these - I
>> think the Kona Ute?), but all the weights are all in, so for the
>cargo bike
>> that's the rider, shopping and anything else you may be carrying.
>> 
>> This is just a FWIW posting, but there are lots of very overweight
>folk in
>> society which decide to use cycling to lose weight (a good thing
>should they
>> so choose to do lose weight that way), but are often sold unsuitable
>cycles
>> for the job. I would have thought there was a market for stronger
>cycles, or
>> at least the information about any weight limit should be up front in
>big
>> print. A catastrophic frame failure on the go is never going to be a
>good
>> thing. However, my 'research' as such is 4 years old and I hope the
>industry
>> has moved on.
>> 
>
>Indeed. Not everybody would be able to afford this, but for anyone who
>could I'd recommend having a made-to-measure frame built by an
>experienced framebuilder.
>
>A round-the-world bike designed for fully-loaded touring in rough
>countries would also be a good choice I think.
>
>B

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to