On 9/29/2015 11:07 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
......(snip snip)
The issue I have is when someone represents a composite photo as reality.
Me too, P.J.
I rather like RHINE II , actually. But then I like Kenneth Noland too
ann
On 9/29/2015 10:57 PM, Knarf wrote:
Well, for one thing Rhine II sold for $4.3 million while this piece
of dreck is on Facebook.
Cheers,
frank
On 29 September, 2015 10:13:37 PM EDT, "P.J. Alling"
<webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote:
Though the technique leaves a bit to be desired, is this really any
different than Rhine II?
On 9/29/2015 8:43 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I'm normally averse to grabbing other people's shots from Facebook,
but this fake really pissed me off. I forget who the (claimed)
photographer is, but that's just as well. This is allegedly an
"antler
arch" in Jackson Hole, Wyoming photographed at such an angle as to
put
the lunar eclipse right next to it. Count the ways in which this
screams "fake"... before you even try opening it up in Photoshop and
brightening it enough to see how shitty the cut-and-paste really was.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/FakeRedMoon.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
