Hi Jonathan, Have you considered the Pentax FA 20mm 2.8, I have one and it's an awesome lens?
I hate to ask you this question, but here goes, Why get a great, expensive , sharp Ultra Wide, then put a plastic filter in front of it? Sincerely, Ryan >Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 21:22:56 -0700 (PDT) >From: Jonathan Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Thanks Ultra-Wide Anglers! (Now a few more >questions...) >Hello, Thanks to everyone who responded to my questions about a good, sub-20mm ultra-wide for Pentax. I only have the luxury of "surfing" on weekends, hence the belated reply. This week's discussions on favorite WA's and true focal length were quite informative (provocative?) #1)I was inspired to save up and hold out (look harder?) for a Pentax K18/3.5 until I learned its true focal length of 19mm. That seems so close to 20mm, that I might as well just get the A20/2.8 which is [somewhat] cheaper, easier to find, and faster (but not as wide as I wanted). Does anybody know if the A20/2.8 is ~truly~ 20mm,... or is it 21mm or 22mmish? Can it take the Cokin P system without vignetting? Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness http://health.yahoo.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
