The tone is what disturbs me. I realize that there's no literal holocaust denial here, but Frank's post suggested that Hittler wasn't really all that bad. I agree, it was weird.
Paul via phone > On Nov 15, 2015, at 9:11 PM, Mark Roberts <postmas...@robertstech.com> wrote: > > knarf wrote: > >> Wow, Mark! I was totally making that shit up as I went along. Who knew it >> was actually accurate? > > ;-) > > By the way, there *is* disagreement among historians about whether the > goal of Hitler's invasion of Russia was the destruction of the > communist Soviet Union itself or to convince Britain to surrender by > removing the USSR as a potential ally. There are good cases made on > both sides. > > >>> On November 15, 2015 8:42:04 PM EST, Mark Roberts >>> <postmas...@robertstech.com> wrote: >>> Paul Stenquist wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks. It certainly makes more sense than your attempt to rationalize >>> Hitler's goals. That's laughable. >>> >>> ??? He wasn't rationalizing Hitler's goals! He was *describing* them. >>> Quite accurately, too. Check out Ian Kershaw's superb biography of >>> Hitler. It's a big two volumes but well worth the effort. Generally >>> considered the best historical biography of Hitler. John Lukacs' >>> various books on the war may be better for a casual read ? try The >>> "Lase European War" or "The Duel". Great stuff and they, like most >>> historians, agree with Kershaw on Hitler's goals. > > -- > Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia > www.robertstech.com > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
