Thank you. That works for me. Paul via phone
> On Nov 15, 2015, at 9:34 PM, knarf <knarftheria...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hmmm... > > I think I'll just let my posts speak for themselves, rather than argue that > point with you, Paul. I don't think anything that I said suggested Hitler as > "not really all that bad." > > In case it needs clarification: Hitler was one of the most evil individuals > that the world has yet produced. I'm not saying the most evil because one > could make a case for Stalin or Mao (each of whom may have actually killed > more of their own than Hitler). > > But the systematic, organized way he attempted (and came frighteningly close > to) the genocide of the Jewish people is unparalleled. That alone qualifies > him as the most evil, IMHO. > > I just want to make that point unequivocally. > > Cheers, > > frank > >> On November 15, 2015 9:16:05 PM EST, Paul Stenquist >> <pnstenqu...@comcast.net> wrote: >> The tone is what disturbs me. I realize that there's no literal >> holocaust denial here, but Frank's post suggested that Hittler wasn't >> really all that bad. I agree, it was weird. >> >> Paul via phone >> >>>> On Nov 15, 2015, at 9:11 PM, Mark Roberts >>> <postmas...@robertstech.com> wrote: >>> >>> knarf wrote: >>> >>>> Wow, Mark! I was totally making that shit up as I went along. Who >> knew it was actually accurate? >>> >>> ;-) >>> >>> By the way, there *is* disagreement among historians about whether >> the >>> goal of Hitler's invasion of Russia was the destruction of the >>> communist Soviet Union itself or to convince Britain to surrender by >>> removing the USSR as a potential ally. There are good cases made on >>> both sides. >>> >>> >>>>> On November 15, 2015 8:42:04 PM EST, Mark Roberts >> <postmas...@robertstech.com> wrote: >>>>> Paul Stenquist wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. It certainly makes more sense than your attempt to >> rationalize >>>>> Hitler's goals. That's laughable. >>>>> >>>>> ??? He wasn't rationalizing Hitler's goals! He was *describing* >> them. >>>>> Quite accurately, too. Check out Ian Kershaw's superb biography of >>>>> Hitler. It's a big two volumes but well worth the effort. Generally >>>>> considered the best historical biography of Hitler. John Lukacs' >>>>> various books on the war may be better for a casual read ? try The >>>>> "Lase European War" or "The Duel". Great stuff and they, like most >>>>> historians, agree with Kershaw on Hitler's goals. >>> >>> -- >>> Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia >>> www.robertstech.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> PDML@pdml.net >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above >> and follow the directions. > > -- > > "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -- Henri Cartier-Bresson > > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
