I've also found the Epson software to be good. I tried Vuescan, but couldn't get it to do any better than the Epson. Maybe user error, but I don't see the need to try any more.
Chris On 27 February 2016 at 02:33, Bruce Walker <bruce.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@mac.com> wrote: >> >> Paul via phone >> >> > On Feb 26, 2016, at 9:09 PM, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote: >> > >> > Christine Aguila wrote: >> > >> >>> The really big downside to Vuescan is the utterly unintuitive interface. >> >>> It was >> >>> (I haven't used it for a very long time) the most unfriendly GUI >> >>> software I've >> >>> ever used. That may have changed. >> >> >> >> that’s a really big downside for me. I don’t have much patience for >> >> fussy user interfaces. C >> > >> > It's trivial to download and try, I didn't find the UI that bad. >> > >> I thought the UI was okay, sort of like mid '80s software. But the >> performance and control sensitivity is absolute horseshit. > > You nailed it, Paul. > > I tried to make minor adjustments to it and the results were all over > the map with tiny changes in the controls. And the UI was clearly > designed by somebody with no understanding of either UI design or Mac > s/w development. > > The Epson s/w is by far the better choice, if imperfect. > > -- > -bmw > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
