On 4/4/2016 6:21 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 5/4/16, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
The 1.4 is what?<internet statistic> ~95%</internet statistic> as good
in depth
of field for less than a third of the price. Unless you want the LX
gold plated
1.2, in which case it's even better value.
Looks like a case of lens envy overwhelming photographic commonsense.
All true.
If no bargains present, then the 1.4 it will be. Actually not as cheap
these days as they used to be!
I bet you could pick up a 50/1.4 supertak darned cheap, and it should
work just fine on a mirrorless unit.
I'm pretty sure I have one of those somewhere too.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
