On 1/6/2017 3:03 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Interesting comparisons. I see a small but noticeable improvement in
detail in Image 3 compared with image 1.
If I recall correctly, Ricoh's implementation of pixel shift produces
images with the same pixel dimensions as a 'normal' image but with
increased detail. This contrasts with the Olympus implementation which
produces images about 4 times (in area) that of the 'normal' file. I
just bought an E-M5 MkII but I'm yet to test its pixel shift capability.
I'm not sure it's something I'd use often anyway.
I'm not sure about the Olympus version. It's a cheap way of making a big
pixel count image, but then you will most likely bin most of them anyway.
The Pentax version actually does a lot more for the image than that. I
didn't think I would use it much until I started using it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
