> On Jan 26, 2017, at 10:36 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi <godd...@me.com> wrote: > >> Thanks, Mark. That helps. >> >> It also raises something else I’ve been wondering about. Can I set ISO to a >> low value, use whatever aperture and shutting settings I want for depth of >> field and capturing motion, not bother about underexposure, adjust exposure >> in post processing, and retain the advantages of low ISO, i.e, a less >> grainy/noisy image? > > Yes, up to a point. That's the point of ISO invariant shooting. For any given > camera/sensor, you have to experiment to determine just what the trade offs > are.
Thanks, Godfrey. I notice the disadvantage you mention in the other post—possibly losing ability to focus accurately. Can autofocus be trusted in such situations? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Weir Decatur, GA USA eew...@bellsouth.net “Let the beauty we love be what we do.” - Rumi -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
