FWIW, I have a ZK 35mm f2.0 T* which I have used sparingly. Never having owned a Pentax 35mm, I can’t make any sort of comparison.
I like the look and feel of the lens, I like the results. But do I really need this when I have the D FA 24-70mm f2.8? Well, but then I think about fixed-focal shooting, and what a nice set of primes I have in the 20/2.8, 24/2.0, 35/2.0, 50/1.2, 100/2.8 macro… But only the macro is a “modern” lens with some degree of weather resistance, and with autofocus combined with a quick-shift feature. The Zeiss 35/2.0 and others of my fixed-focal-length collection periodically get moved to the “sell these soon” end of the shelf. And then I fondle them and take a few pictures and put them back out of harm’s way. I don’t think you would go wrong buying one of these lenses. stan > On Jan 22, 2017, at 11:35 AM, Steve Cottrell <co...@seeingeye.tv> wrote: > > On 22/1/17, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> KEH.com has a ZK 50mm f1.4 T* for a not outrageous price. "A" mount >> equivalent. I'd buy it but I'm broke at the moment. > > How do you think it compares optically to the Pentax M50/1.4 ? > > -- > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ Broadcast, Corporate, > || (O) | Web Video Production > ---------- <www.seeingeye.tv> > _____________________________ > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
