> On Feb 14, 2017, at 1:52 PM, Stanley Halpin <s...@stans-photography.info> > wrote: > > FWIW, I have a ZK 35mm f2.0 T* which I have used sparingly. Never having > owned a Pentax 35mm, I can’t make any sort of comparison. > > I like the look and feel of the lens, I like the results. But do I really > need this when I have the D FA 24-70mm f2.8? > Well, but then I think about fixed-focal shooting, and what a nice set of > primes I have in the 20/2.8, 24/2.0, 35/2.0, 50/1.2, 100/2.8 macro… > But only the macro is a “modern” lens with some degree of weather resistance, > and with autofocus combined with a quick-shift feature. > The Zeiss 35/2.0 and others of my fixed-focal-length collection periodically > get moved to the “sell these soon” end of the shelf. And then I fondle them > and take a few pictures and put them back out of harm’s way. > > I don’t think you would go wrong buying one of these lenses. > > stan >
I just checked, the on-line store where I bought the 35/2.0 Distagon has another for sale: $628 http://stores.ebay.com/Matsuiyastore/Zeiss-/_i.html?_fsub=3629112&_sid=209579062&_trksid=p4634.c0.m322 stan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
