It was probably around 1998-99, when I realized that another PP
(Practical Photography) had a much better quality content.
I remember I was buying that one regularly.
Pop.Photography was emptier. Then Practical Photography declined (rather
sharply, IMHO), but Pop.Photography did not become better...
I am actually surprised it survived this long...
Igor
Godfrey DiGiorgi Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:01:45 -0800 wrote:
They lost me long ago, when the average content became greater than 75%
advertising and almost all the articles became insipid.
G
On Mar 8, 2017, at 3:48 PM, Jack Davis <jdavi...@comcast.net> wrote:
It was getting thinner and thinner with every issue. I would take a quick
ruffle thru glance and usually that was it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
