On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Zos Xavius <zosxav...@gmail.com> wrote: > someone leaked the test results for the 645z from dxomark (yes they > tested it) and it came to 100 if I remember correctly. a lot of people > think there is a conspiracy, but who knows? > > that said the K-1 is the better choice in many ways unless you are > looking to spend thousands on lenses. The newer zooms are definitely > not cheap on the 645Z. Neither is the 90mm and such. > > With pixel shift the results are pretty close between the two. Close > enough to offset the massive difference in cost. Unless medium format > is totally your thing, then I could understand. I keep thinking about > a used 645D myself.
I agree that pixel-shift might pretty-much close the gap between the two bodies for landscape, but it is completely useless for many styles/subjects of shooting. Like any kind of people or sports. Any handheld use. In fact anything at all where the subject or camera might move. :) And then there's the issue of processing pixel-shifted results. All I hear lately is folks perplexed about how you post-process pixel-shifted files. To me all this makes pixel shift a novelty feature. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
