Methinks that unless you compare RAW files, you’re not comparing sensors, only processing.
Rick > On Jul 6, 2018, at 4:13 AM, Alan C <c...@lantic.net> wrote: > > OK. Here they are: > > https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/43181328112/ > > K5 shown - scroll for K110D Both 6Mp 3star JPEG's. > > Both taken with the HD 55 - 300mm @ 300mm f8 AV Range of subject about > 40m. Mininimal post processing, images uncropped, not sharpened > > If you look at the EXIF you will see that the resolution of the K110D image > is 72dpi whereas the K5 image is 300dpi. > > The original K110D file is 4.64Mp & the K5 5.72Mp > > Visually I can't see any difference. Both original files start to become > pixellated at about 150% zoom. > > I think we need some expert comment here. > > Alan C > > BTW, don't you think that old K110D still does a good job? > > > On 06-Jul-18 06:51 AM, Alan C wrote: >> I remember setting my K7 to 6Mp to compare with my K110D (max 6.1Mp). I >> could see no difference but the K7 files were considerably larger than the >> K110D files. I'll repeat the exercise later today with the K110D & the K5 >> (sold the K7) & post the images & stats. >> >> Alan C >> >> >> On 05-Jul-18 11:22 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote: >>> are the photos from a 16Mp DSLR set to the 6 Mp setting sharper >>> than a 6 Mp DSLR running at full resolution? My hunch is they would be but >>> has anyone ever tried this or a similar comparison? >>> >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus >> >> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
