As has been noted that's a very nice photo. By any chance is the original processing of it available? It would be interesting to compare.
On February 6, 2019 5:28:38 PM PST, Mark Roberts <postmas...@robertstech.com> wrote: >Jostein Øksne wrote: > >>The istD is still a good camera. Software has come a long way in >fifteen years. >>The camera I miss the most is actually the K10D. It had very special >raw files, with its sensor oversampling technique. > >Oh yeah. The K-10D had a nice "look" to its images. Not nearly as mush >dynamic range as today's sensors and obviously a bit noisier, but >wonderful when used within its limits. As is the ist-D sensor, of >course. > >>It's a nice image too, Mark. Love the play of sunlight and shadow >across the landscape. > >I suppose that's the real point: When the light is good most of the >job is taken care of for you, no matter what camera/sensor you're >using. > >>>https://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d500929.jpg > > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >PDML@pdml.net >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >follow the directions. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
