I never really thought the K10D sensor was mush...
On 2/6/2019 8:28 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Jostein Øksne wrote:
The istD is still a good camera. Software has come a long way in fifteen years.
The camera I miss the most is actually the K10D. It had very special raw files,
with its sensor oversampling technique.
Oh yeah. The K-10D had a nice "look" to its images. Not nearly as mush
dynamic range as today's sensors and obviously a bit noisier, but
wonderful when used within its limits. As is the ist-D sensor, of
course.
It's a nice image too, Mark. Love the play of sunlight and shadow across the
landscape.
I suppose that's the real point: When the light is good most of the
job is taken care of for you, no matter what camera/sensor you're
using.
https://www.robertstech.com/temp/7d500929.jpg
--
America wasn't founded so that we could all be better.
America was founded so we could all be anything we damn well please.
- P.J. O'Rourke
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
