> On 30 Mar 2019, at 11:12, Steve Cottrell <co...@seeingeye.tv> wrote: > > On 30/3/19, Bob Pdml, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> To me the sensible, democratic way forward is what they should have done >> in the first place. Withdraw article 50 with a binding commitment to re- >> invoke it at the end of a consultation and decision-making process. Set >> up an independent royal commission or similar, across the various >> political fragments to consult people here about what type of Brexit >> they could live with, discuss (not negotiate from fixed positions) with >> the EU what is reasonable and acceptable, agree a plan, re-invoke A50. >> >> If during that consultation it becomes clear that a very substantial >> majority no longer want Brexit, then another referendum at the end of >> the process on a set of options with transferable votes might be justifiable. > > I like it. >
That's how things could be resolved in a rational society where people respected each other and their differences. Unfortunately we live in a society run by mad dogs and neoliberals who will eat their own children to make an extra buck. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
