I agree. I would have dialed out a little more saturation on the third try. As you said, the film seems highly saturated, much like Velvia. But I was quite pleased with the sharpness and grain. It would be interesting to compare it to a good lab print. I think that even though it's not scanned at optimum resolution, it's sharper than a good optical print. Paul
"J. C. O'Connell" wrote: > > got it today, looks great. very accurate to the scan. > If I was to print it myself I think I would cut > the saturation a bit, the film (Fujichrome ms 100/1000) > seems a little to saturated at ISO 100 which is what I shot > it at. Lack of grain and sharpness is excellent, which > is much better than 35mm 11X14"s > JCO > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Stenquist > > Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 7:04 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: 6X7 Fujichromes and the epson 2450 > > > > > > I have an Epson 1200. The ink isn't as permanent as the 1270 or 1280, > > but some say it produces better prints. I like them. I'll try to get the > > print in the mail tomorrow. > > Paul > > > > "J. C. O'Connell" wrote: > > > > > > wow, thanks. What printer do you use? > > > My address is: > > > JC OCONNELL > > > 3203 NW 103 TERR > > > CORAL SPRINGS, FL > > > 33065 > > > THANKS AGAIN. CANT WAIT TO SEE IT. > > > JCO > > > > > > SORRY FOR POSTING TO LIST BUT > > > DONT HAVE YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS > > > JCO > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Stenquist > > > > Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 6:27 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: 6X7 Fujichromes and the epson 2450 > > > > > > > > > > > > I made an 11 x14 print of your scan. It looks very good to my eye. The > > > > ripples on the water are sharply defined as is the grid on the > > > > lighthouse windows. The person standing on the sandy beach at the far > > > > right is cleary visible as well. This scanner is certainly a > > good choice > > > > for MF and an outstanding value. Send me your address, and > > I'll mail you > > > > the print. Postage and materials are on me. > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > "J. C. O'Connell" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I'm uploading it to server now. It's at 2400 ppi > > > > > (2400 ppi is the scanners max optical resolution) > > > > > and slightly cropped. ( 3.2 Mb download). > > > > > file will be at : > > > > > > > > > > http://jcoconnell.com/temp/inlet1m.jpg > > > > > > > > > > in a few minutes. > > > > > > > > > > Let me know how print comes out. There is > > > > > tons of fine detail in the scan. > > > > > > > > > > I used 20% jpeg compression which retains > > > > > original quality as far as I can see. > > > > > Lens was 105mm F2.4 SMCT at F11 (1/250 sec). > > > > > > > > > > If you mail me the print I will pay you > > > > > for postage and materials. I am dying > > > > > to get the epson 1280 printer. > > > > > JCO > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Stenquist > > > > > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 8:30 PM > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Subject: Re: 6X7 Fujichromes and the epson 2450 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Looks good, J.C. What lens were you shooting? Have you tried > > > > maxing out > > > > > > that Epson 2450? I'd love to see how a transparency > > scanned at 3200 > > > > > > prints on an Epson 1200 series printer. If you would burn > > one to a CD > > > > > > and mail it to me, I'll make a print and send it back to you. > > > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > > > > > "J. C. O'Connell" wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > heres one that shows texture nicely. > > > > > > > Critical focus was on the first trestle > > > > > > > with the "keep off" sign: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://jcoconnell.com/temp/pier1s.jpg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JCO > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To > > unsubscribe, > > > > > > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. > > Don't forget to > > > > > > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > > > > > > - > > > > > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To > > unsubscribe, > > > > > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. > > Don't forget to > > > > > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > > > > > - > > > > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > > > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > > > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > > > > - > > > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > > > - > > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
