Well, yes, but some of the tributaries dried up too so they’ll contribute their dry bits.
> On 17 Aug 2022, at 07:05, mike wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > > The river gets so much wider, it will only be a few millimetres long. >> On 16/08/2022 15:24 Bob Pdml <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> It would be interesting to be by the river in London when that dry bit >> passes through. >> >>>> On 16 Aug 2022, at 14:49, Steve Cottrell <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I understand the headlines but this is not strictly true. >>> >>> First of all, define ‘source’ = how large an area? The actual source of the >>> Thames is merely an area in a dip where water runs off surrounding hills in >>> Gloucestershire (quite near me) and collects, forming a trickle downhill >>> that turns into a small stream. Yes that has dried up, but has happened >>> before a few times. >>> >>> But the headline sounds suitably cataclysmic :-) >>> >>> Cot >>> >>> >>>> On 11 Aug 2022, at 13:00, Ralf R Radermacher <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> For the first time in living memory, the source of the river Thames has >>> dried up > -- > %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
