By the way if you can find the 120 you'll love it. It is very good for the type of photography you're interested in.
At 03:51 PM 7/31/2002 -0500, you wrote: >Thanks for the suggestion, Lukasz. > >If I can't track down a M 120/2.8 at a reasonable price I will probably go >for either a SMC-M 100/2.8 or 135/3.5. Can somebody tell me about these >lenses when used wide open or close to it? I'm mainly interested in their >performance when focused from 15 feet and farther. > >I really would like something a little longer than 100mm as I already have >a macro in that length and a 35-105/3.5 zoom. I know nobody likes the >SMC-A 135/2.8 or the Tak-A 135/2.5, but the faster SMC 135s are too $$$ >and really bigger than what I want. Was there a Ricoh or Vivitar S1 >135/2.8 (non-macro)? > >Steven. > >-- >__________________________________________________________ >Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com >http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup > >Get 4 DVDs for $.49 cents! plus shipping & processing. Click to join. >http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/990-1736-3566-59 >- >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
