----- Original Message ----- From: Bruce Dayton Subject: Re: LX repair update
> William, > > All I can say is that I am sure glad that the first time I peered > through one of Shel's LX's that I didn't care for the style of > interface of the meter. That coupled with the long running issues > that I have heard about LX's makes me glad that I don't have any. I > know that they are older and probably hold up longer than many other > bodies, but that doesn't negate the fact that they are starting to > wear out. That was one of the reasons that I moved forward from my > old SuperProgram (which I rather liked) to a PZ-1p and then an MZ-S. > Of course, then I was coerced into the "Light" and got my 67II. I > still can't get over the difference in detail of the negative and > resulting prints. Call me Canadian, but for some reason that is not to be fathomed, I still like the darnded things, I suppose for the same reason I liked my Triumph Trident, even though it required 4 hours of work per hour of riding. William Robb - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
