Yes, and I'm an almost 55 year old fart who has trouble doing more than one
thing at a time, hence the forget to alter the cut and past "I mostly use my
SMC Tak 1:2.8 105 on my ME and ME Super" to "I also use my....".
, I should also mention that I probably last used a 135mm for outdoor
portraits, back in Singapore in 1975(Super Tak) .
James
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Adams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: favorite portrait lens (was Re: Orgin Myths)


> Although I love both my SMC Tak 1:3.5 135 and Super Tak 1:3.5 135, I
mostly
> use my 105 with my SPF for portraits.  I mostly use my SMC Tak 1:2.8 105
on
> my ME and ME Super.
>
> Two years ago, I bought my Nikon Photomic FTn, and shortly afterwards, a
> Soligor 1:2.8 105mm. I found could interchange mounts for use with my M42
> and K-mount cameras. This is neat portrait lens, and gives great results.
> James
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dr E D F Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:59 PM
> Subject: Re: favorite portrait lens (was Re: Orgin Myths)
>
>
> > I agree too, 135mm is a great length for portraits. I use a Vivitar
> > 135mm/f3.5 VMC Auto for the job. If anyone is interested I put up some
> > pictures - taken a couple of weeks ago for the family. They are all
there
> > (link below) including the imperfect ones. Everyone wanted to see them
> all.
> > My wife's family is spread over Northern Europe and only get together
once
> > in a while. I haven't tweaked the files yet so they may look a bit
blue -
> > depends on your monitor. Available light, shutter speed on auto, lens
wide
> > open, camera P30T.
> >
> > http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams/hold/index.com
> >
> > Don - 70 4/12 years old - one of the few 'old farts' on this list.
> >
> > Dr E D F Williams
> >
> > http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
> > Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
> > Updated: March 30, 2002
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Mishka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 5:44 AM
> > Subject: favorite portrait lens (was Re: Orgin Myths)
> >
> >
> > > I second 135mm. Same story: got M135/3.5 -- couldn't resist the price,
> and
> > > liked it so much that ended up with K135/2.5. Very convenient length.
> And,
> > > not the least, 135/3.5 is really small and light.
> > >
> > > Mishka
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Dan Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:33 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Orgin Myths
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Monday, September 9, 2002, at 07:43  PM, Michael Cross wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm 37 and, believe it or not, I am just starting out with Pentax.
> As
> > > > > far as I
> > > > > know a Spotmatic is a washing machine.
> > > > >
> > > > > I just bought a ZX-L body.  Now I just need one of you PDMLer's to
> > tell
> > > > > which
> > > > > prime lens I ought to buy first for people photography.
> > > > >
> > > > > Michael Cross
> > > >
> > > > My most frequently used "people" lens is my FA 35/2.—I use it on
> groups,
> > > > environmental portraits, and on up to half-length individual
> portraits.
> > > > If you have the dough and don't mind the extra weight, the FA 31/1.9
> is
> > > > an even better lens (at least, Cesar's 31/1.9 is better than my
35/2).
> > > >
> > > > Of my other Pentax lenses—lengths of 50mm, 77mm, 100mm, and
135mm—the
> > > > 135mm most comfortably handles what 35mm can't. I find it a great
> length
> > > > for head shots—the physical distance between me and my subject is
> close
> > > > enough to be sociable but not so close as to be invasive. Perfect
for
> > > > shooting across a table. I originally bought an M 135/3.5 just to
try
> > > > the length, figuring on getting the FA 135/2.8 if it worked out. I
> > > > picked up an Ex+ example for $40 and shipping about a year and a
half
> > > > ago and still haven't moved up to the FA 135/2.8—it is definitely
one
> of
> > > > the great bargains of the Pentax lineup.
> > > >
> > > > Good luck choosing,
> > > >
> > > > Dan Scott (42 1/12 years old)
>
>
>


Reply via email to