>Hey, I'm not here to argue semantics. This gets into semantics is because >either myself or another poster aren't talking on the same wavelength. >I've admitted a couple of times it has been my fault because I didn't >phrase a sentence a certain way or give my definition of a term. The >reason why I've been talking about my possible switch is to get some >*positive* feedback on why it might be better to stay with Pentax. I don't >have all the answers. I thought that by posting here I could engage in >some civil debate about Pentax-Canon platforms and see if there was >something I was overlooking in the analyzation of my particular situation >with the equipment I now have.
I was off the list a few days so I might miss something. >I would prefer to buy new. I've had too many hassles with used stuff and >also would like a warranty to fall back on for a while. To me I've sank >enough money into my ME-Super that I bought used. I've seen people who >have "good money chase after bad money" when it comes to an used car. They >fix one thing, another one goes, then something else, on and on, until they >were better off getting a newer car. I do like my ME-Super but there's a >point with my budget that I don't like it *that* much. For brand new Pentax bodies without capability issue, MZ/ZX-M could be considered. Nope, I don't like its viewfinder which I think is too small and difficult to focus manually, but seems that I am the only one here. :( So don't hestitate to check it out. MZ/ZX-3, 5n, 6 & 7 can be considered too. If you want split image screen, just ask the Pentax service centre to install the MZ/ZX-M screen for you. They are interchangable. I suppose you wouldn't consider MZ-S. There were 2 or 3 Pentax AF bodies couldn't meter with pre-A lenses, but I cannot remember which (MZ-10 & MZ-30?). regards, Alan Chan _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
