David, I, too, have not had very good luck with Fuji. I will say that for cheap consumer film, the 800 Superia is pretty good - much better than the Kodak zoom max (whatever they call it now) stuff.
Like you, I have been mostly using Portra and Optima II. I'm going to try another roll or two of the Agfa Portrait and pay special attention to the lab to see how it turns out. My last experience with it wasn't very good. I'll keep you posted. Bruce Thursday, September 26, 2002, 6:32:01 AM, you wrote: DB> Hi Wendy. DB> Finally someone else besides myself has a problem DB> with the Fuji 400.I would get a blue hue to all DB> the proofs.Oh and were i take it is a Fuji lab, DB> and he's a Fuji shooter,so i'll assume he knows the product. DB> Dave(switched to Portra and Optima II for colour)Brooks DB> ---- Begin Original Message ---- DB> From: wendy beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> DB> Sent: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 00:11:38 -0400 DB> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DB> Subject: Re: Pentax AutoFocus / Consumer Fast Film DB> At 23:36 25-9-2002 -0400, you wrote: >>Did I read you wrong when you said 'the vile Fugi 400 stuff'? Do DB> you mean >>the older versions or did you mistype Fugi and meant Kodak or DB> something? >> >>Regards, >> >>Brad Dobo DB> No, I meant Fuji (superia) 400. DB> 200 is fine, 800 is fine. I just don't know what they did to the 400 DB> to DB> make it so gruesome. Luminous greens - yuk. DB> Wendy DB> --- DB> Wendy Beard DB> Ottawa, Canada DB> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] DB> home page http://www.beard-redfern.com DB> ---- End Original Message ---- DB> Pentax User DB> Stouffville Ontario Canada DB> http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/ DB> http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses DB> Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
