P.S. by the way Pal, which camera do you still have, the z-1p or the LX? If I read your last email correctly, it sounds like you ditched the z-1p, but still have at least one LX.
Cheers (from the bush once more....) Shaun Canning Archaeology Department La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, 3086. Phone: 0414-967 644 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Pål Jensen [mailto:paaljensen@;sensewave.com] Sent: Saturday, 9 November 2002 10:53 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LX MAcro Question Shaun wrote: >I can only compare this to the results I > got with my z-1 and the same lens. The LX produces truly superior images. > The z-1 was a great camera, but the LX produces much nicer macro shots > (maybe it is all the mirror lock, but I don't think so). Huh? I think you have to go further into the bush to get anyone to believe that a camera creates better images than another. I've never noticed that my LX take better images than the Z-1p I once owned. >ZMetering is just a > non-event with the LX and close-up work. Set too auto and forget really. Isn't that the case with any modern camera? Pål
