Dr E D F Williams wrote: > > Aaaaargh! I rank Epson with Microsoft - as far as business ethics goes. The > damn thing uses more ink cleaning the jets than it does printing. I can't > keep feeding it at 50 Euros a meal. Can't afford to keep this pet alive. > Once, a couple of Christmases back, I used a colour cartridge up - without > getting one decent print. So good-bye Epson. Maybe one day I'll buy a > printer that has the jets on the cartridges.
That's someone like Hewlett Packard ~ but let me tell you, I've had three increasingly more expensive H-Ps, and I've yet to see a home-based H-P (ink-jet) printer that can hold a candle to Epson when it comes to color photographic style images/prints... Gotta be some other, less-expensive answer than Epson's ink-devouring printers, I'd say. Maybe it hasn't been designed yet... On the other hand, I LOVE my Epson digital camera! Outstanding photos! So long as I just keep 'em on a screen somewhere, they're perfect for viewing, and the whole thing is [relatively] inexpensive. keith whaley > To start with of course it was wonderful. I got very good prints after the > initial setting up - getting the monitor and output to look more or less the > same. > > Don
