In a message dated 11/14/02 12:30:39 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << 1) The other factor of zooms vs. primes is purely what one enjoys using. Much like saying that a PZ-1p or MZ-S can run circles around a SuperProgram or MX. Some just prefer the style and handling and subsequent flow that goes with one or the other. I personally find that using a prime helps me (forces me) to be more conscientious about my shots (including better technique). This doesn't mean that the zoom couldn't be used identically, just that I tend to be more sloppy and quick. Ideally it would be nice to have a set of primes and good zooms and pick the right tool at the right time. Unfortunately for me, I can't justify both - too many other things taking up my funds.
2) Faster lenses as you say gives you the ability to see in the viewfinder easier. When I shoot weddings, I find frequently that receptions are in very dim lighting. Focusing is a real issue and any speed here helps - not shooting aperture, just viewing aperture. However, the other big advantage of a faster lens is the ability to have a greater range of DOF control. There are times when I like to be able to open up to blur the background more. 3) Sorry, just thought of another. Many times there are compromises in zooms where closest focusing is not anywhere near the equivalent prime. Not always true, but quite often. Bruce >> Nicely put Bruce. I agree entirely... Vic
