Oh ya, I've got a zoom, a SMCP-FA 28-105mm Zoom f/4-5.6 [IF], but is that a
fair test (of course assuming I ever see a Ltd.)

Brad
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:27 AM
Subject: RE: 28-105 vs 24-90 vs 35-105


> I havent used them, but both the 50 and the 100 you mention are also
> well regarded.  You should be able to see the difference clearly between
> these and any consumer zoom.  Do you have a zoom in the same range?  Sat
> a 28-70 or such?  If so then why do you have the 50 if its not clearly
> better?
>
> I know the problems of having no camera buddies, that's why I am always
> on the internet...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brad Dobo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 21 November 2002 02:48
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: 28-105 vs 24-90 vs 35-105
> >
> >
> > I agree Rob, and Rob <g>
> >
> > I'm interested, I'm looking into the techs here to hear what
> > they have to say about the Ltds., build, optics, looks,
> > design, cost-relation.  But of course after all this chat,
> > I'd like to put one on my MZ-S and try it, shoot a roll of
> > Provia 100 F.  Other than the FA 50mm f/1.4 I have nothing
> > similar to compare it to, unless you think the FA 100mm f/2.8
> > Macro as a normal lens would help?  Thoughts?  Of course, we
> > could figure this all out and I'll never find a place that
> > stocks one, and I have zero camera friends here to help.  Any
> > of my buddies ideas of photography is hire a pro, borrow me,
> > or buy a disposable. :/
> >
> > Brad.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:39 PM
> > Subject: RE: 28-105 vs 24-90 vs 35-105
> >
> >
> > > On 21 Nov 2002 at 0:22, Rob Brigham wrote:
> > >
> > > > I don't know how to educate people that think like this.
> > It is not
> > > > a question of being demanding, but of seeing the proof of the
> > > > pudding. Unfortunately Pentax marketing precludes this experience
> > > > from many.
> > >
> > > Once you've spent a little time here (PDML) you learn to listen to
> > > many
> > posters
> > > opinions, they are often far more valuable than any
> > published review
> > > or independent MTF tests. IOW the closest thing to hands on testing
> > > with out
> > the
> > > feel of cold metal <VBG> in your hands.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Rob Studdert
> > > HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
> > > Tel +61-2-9554-4110
> > > UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications.html
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to