On 7/21/05, Rodney Mishima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've tried to kill further conversation about "bag inserts". I never
intended for us to pursue it.
My apologies. I will attempt to constrain all future remarks to
approved topics only.
ok. I guess "bag insert" has special meaning to the convention junkie.
The ONLY reason I mentioned it: I thought the figure of 2000 was a decent <
HIGH > estimate of the number of CDs we should burn. Whether we should do a
CD is still up in the air.
I don't think we did more than 300-400 two years ago. Copying
thousands of CDs is likely to be way out of reach unless someone here
has access to high-volume CD replication.
I think 300-400 was a very low estimate. I recall burning at least
150 myself, and thought some other person burned more than me.
Assuming 5 minutes per unit, copying 2000 CDs would take almost 7 full
24-hour days... that's an impressive amount of time even if we split
it up 5-10 ways.
But perhaps we should decide whether we are doing a CD before spending
much time deciding on the right quantity to make. Just a thought.
Dylan
Finally, back to the main concern: To burn or not to burn
So far, I have not identified anyone who is an enthusiastic proponent
for burning a "custom Knoppix cd" [ or moving up to a DVD]
Anyone want to step up and argue in favor of burning CDs?
Rodney
_______________________________________________
PDXLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pdxlug.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxlug
IRC: irc.freenode.net #pdxlug
