Jon, List: > On Aug 15, 2025, at 4:45 PM, Jon Alan Schmidt <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Peirce's transformation rules for EGs correspond to inferences that are > strictly deductive, not abductive nor inductive--they ensure that a false EG > is never derived from a true EG, rather than facilitating ampliative reasoning
The ontology of the natural sciences has not changed; hence the natural relations between analysis and synthesis have probably not changed Ampliative reasoning is necessary to relate indices to legisigns and must necessarily be part of the arguments derived from rhema and dicisign in order for the trichotomy to be consistent. Consequently, this suggests that alternative explanations of the texts could be sought. Cheers Jerry
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . ► <a href="mailto:[email protected]?subject=SIG%20peirce-l";>UNSUBSCRIBE FROM PEIRCE-L</a> . But, if your subscribed email account is not your default email account, then go to https://list.iu.edu/sympa/signoff/peirce-l . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
