> On Sep 1, 2025, at 11:41 AM, Jon Alan Schmidt <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>  Every proposition has at least one subject that cannot be represented 
> symbolically,

but this does not entail that it is structurally incapable of denoting it--only 
that it must do so indexically instead.

Oh dear me, 
I have a symbol that can not be symbolized!

Is this a variant on the Russell paradox?

Cheers
Jerry 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . 
►  <a href="mailto:[email protected]?subject=SIG%20peirce-l";>UNSUBSCRIBE FROM 
PEIRCE-L</a> . But, if your subscribed email account is not your default email 
account, then go to
https://list.iu.edu/sympa/signoff/peirce-l .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  and 
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Reply via email to