Dear Stan, lists What if my own claims are coupled with the theory of science I support - while Stan's own claims are coupled with the theory of science which he supports?
In that case, - my claims are hypotheses framed by discussions and comparisons of different arguments from the tradition, coupled with empirical observations from different sciences, producing fallible truth claims to be discussed and criticized by peers - while - Stan's claims are determined by the actual state of social discourse, placing very close restrictions on which kinds of claims and knowledge may be produced and accepted as knowledge … Could this be right? F
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
