Interesting stuff. There is some debate about what exactly you are showing. I take it to be the use of Brown's Laws of Form represented by edges and nodes. One of the links exhibits the generation and resolution of branches and roots as you might get in a logic check. The addition of cuts and nests I suppose is an analogy with Peirce. There are any number of ways to look at it semiotically. (Basically, the graphs interpret the laws. The relation is primarily symbolical) Jim W > Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 14:50:47 -0500 > From: jawb...@att.net > To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu > Subject: [PEIRCE-L] Animated Logical Graphs > > Peircers, > > FYM (For Your Musement) ... > > Here are some animations I made up to illustrate several different styles of > proof > in an extended topological variant of Peirce's Alpha Graphs for propositional > logic. > > ☞ https://oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey/ANIMATION#Proof_Animations > > See the following article for a full discussion of this type of logical graph: > > ☞ https://oeis.org/wiki/Logical_Graphs > > Regards, > > Jon > > -- > > academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey > my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/ > inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/ > isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA > oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey > facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
