List, John > On Nov 22, 2017, at 2:28 PM, John F Sowa <s...@bestweb.net> wrote: > >> >> The term “trust” is remote from the logic of symbolic substitutions. > > If Peirce had intended any further meaning, he would have > mentioned it explicitly.
Really? > > There is no notion of 'trust' in the EGs themselves. Really? I suppose that such conjectures are of interest to some. Cheers Jerry
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
