Edwinia: > On Nov 23, 2020, at 7:10 PM, Edwina Taborsky <tabor...@primus.ca> wrote: > > My understanding of Peirce is that there is nothing outside of semiosis!
This is not my understanding of CSP realism. I recall a text that, roughly speaking, asserts that signs are “emanations” of “sin-signs” as objects. Objects that are the same as legisigns and are the necessary sources the qualisigns (observations / measurements). This does not deny the possibilities that all interpretants are semiotic relatives. Some line of reasoning along these lines is necessary if any sense at all is to be made of the scientific foundations of pragmaticism. Cheers Jerry
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with no subject, and with the sole line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
