Gary F, It's ironic that you should talk about tribalism. As you might know, there have been other discussions offline about the "triumvirate" of GR, GF, and JAS. You constantly cite each other's notes with great praise, and ignore or browbeat others. One of the worst examples is a comment you made about JAS as the best able to understand phaneroscopy. He's read a lot, and he quotes a lot. That's a talent that Google has in abundance. But nobody saw ADT's error about the mathematical foundation. Without the math, phaneroscopy is limited to Hegel. Peirce admitted that Hegel had good insights. But without the advantage of modern logic, he couldn't go any farther. And please note that the most widely recognized successor to Hegel is Husserl, who had a PhD in mathematics. Please note Stjernfelt's book on Diagrammatology, in which he emphasizes the mathematical foundations of both Peirce and Husserl. He notes that their theories have a great deal in common, even though their terminology is radically different. John
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
