Joe, I had a hard copy made of the 339 manuscript from 1901 sept until the end of it and I do not reach that: number 361 is the last and one unreadable page after that.
This happens to coincide with the listing of pages by Fernando Zalamea. Auke > -----Original Message----- > From: Joseph Ransdell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: donderdag 16 februari 2006 1:41 > To: Peirce Discussion Forum > Subject: [peirce-l] RE: immediate/mediate, direct/indirect > > > Auke; > > I'm sure of that, yes: that's what the stamp says. > > Joe > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Auke van Breemen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Peirce Discussion Forum" <peirce-l@lyris.ttu.edu> > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 5:50 PM > Subject: [peirce-l] RE: immediate/mediate, direct/indirect > > > Joe, > > Are you sure about the source page number? > -- MS 339.493; c. 1904-05 Logic Notebook > > Auke > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joseph Ransdell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: woensdag 15 februari 2006 21:59 > > To: Peirce Discussion Forum > > Subject: [peirce-l] immediate/mediate, direct/indirect > > > > > > This bears on nothing currently under discussion, but I > > happened upon a note > > copying a passage from the Logic Notebook in which Peirce > > explicitly defines > > immediate and direct and thought I should record it here, given how > > frequently the question comes up.. Of course it may or may > > not record his > > actual usage, but only an intended usage at that time. But > it can be > > compared with other passages in which the terms are defined. > > Anyway, it > > goes as follows: > > > > > > A primal is that which is something that is in itself > > regardless of anything > > else. > > > > A Potential is anything which is in some respect determined > > but whose being > > is not definite > > > > A Feeling is a state of determination of consciousness which > > apparently > > might in its own nature (neglecting our experience of it > > etc.) continue for > > some time unchanged and that has no reference of anything > > else I call a > > state of consciousness immediate which does not refer to > anything not > > present in that very state > > > > I use the terms immediate and direct, not according to their > > etymologies but > > so that to say that A is immediate to B means that it is > > present in B. > > Direct, as I use it means without the aid of any subsidiary > > [unreadable > > word] or operation. > > > > -- MS 339.493; c. 1904-05 Logic Notebook > > > > Joe Ransdell > > > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.8/260 - Release > > Date: 2/14/2006 > > > > > > --- > > Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --- > Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.8/260 - Release > Date: 2/14/2006 > > > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.8/260 - Release > Date: 2/14/2006 > > > --- > Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com
