Please forgive this post from a Peirce discussion lurker.
The APPENDIX shows only 11K of Bernard Morand's gargantuan 236K Pierce post of 23 Mar 2006 09:59:31+0100 titled "Re: R: Re: R: Re: naming definite individuals," as it appears on the PEIRCE-L Digest for Thursday, March 23, 2006. That would have been enough code and HTML gobbledygook, but then Giovanni Maria Ruggiero on 23 Mar 2006 12:03:47+0100 replied to Bernard Morand by hitting the reply button and thus resending Morand's 256K post once again to the Peirce list. I shall forbear mention of suggestions 5-7 of "14 Posting Suggestions" [Hake (2005)]: 5. If you *must* reply to a post by hitting the "reply" button (bane of discussion lists), and thus often littering the list with superfluous already posted once ">", twice ">>", thrice ">>>", etc., etc. material, at least prune the original message normally contained in your reply down to the few lines that are relevant to your reply. 6. Avoid sending ATTACHMENTS to lists - they will often appear as pages of code and may introduce VIRUSES :-( . Instead, place the attachment on a web page and give subscribers the URL. 7. Avoid sending messages in HTML or "enriched text." Some subscribers may find that it is almost impossible to read. Check your mail-system's settings to be sure you are NOT sending mail to discussion lists only in HTML or in a double posting first in ASCII and the in HTML. Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University 24245 Hatteras Street, Woodland Hills, CA 91367 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake> <http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi> REFERENCES Hake, R.R. 2005. "Fourteen Posting Suggestions," online at <http://lists.nau.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0507&L=phys-l&P=R15505>. Post of 25 Jul 2005 16:25:2-0700 to AP-Physics, PhysLrnR, Physhare, and Physoc. MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 00:08:42 -0600 Subject: peirce-l digest: March 23, 2006 To: "peirce-l digest recipients" <peirce-l@lyris.ttu.edu> From: "Peirce Discussion Forum digest" <peirce-l@lyris.ttu.edu> Reply-To: "Peirce Discussion Forum" <peirce-l@lyris.ttu.edu> PEIRCE-L Digest for Thursday, March 23, 2006. 1. Re: R: Re: R: Re: naming definite individuals 2. Re: R: Re: R: Re: naming definite individuals 3. Seminar on Philosophy and Business Management 4. Seminar on Philosophy and Business Management 5. Re: evolving universe 6. Re: Design and Semiotics Revisited (...new thread from "Peircean elements" topic) 7. Re: evolving universe 8. Re: evolving universe 9. Re: evolving universe 10. Re: R: Re: R: Re: naming definite individuals 11. Re: evolving universe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: R: Re: R: Re: naming definite individuals From: Bernard Morand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:59:31 +0100 X-Message-Number: 1 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_KV1+FspCP9XngmiSRn7/Dw) Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Claudio and list, I see that you are using the 3 registers from Lacan as examples(?) of the 3 Peirce's categories in your first nonagon. This would give: Imaginary -> Firstness, Real -> Secondness, Symbolic -> Thirdness. I am not sure at all that this is correct but the question of the possible .......................................... ..........................................
Giovanni, List I don't know if this can help... (I am not sure if the English translation of psycho terms is correct) Without entering the specific discussion I can (as always) show a graphic diagrammatic approach...
.......................................... ..........................................
----- Original Message ----- From: "Giovanni Maria Ruggiero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> To: "Peirce Discussion Forum" <peirce-l@lyris.ttu.edu <mailto:peirce-l@lyris.ttu.edu>> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 10:19 PM Subject: [peirce-l] Re: R: Re: R: Re: naming definite individuals > dear Jim, > > just a rapid remar. I was thinking that emotions, even in the case of very > complex, cognitively rich, sophisticated and social emotions, such as, say, > envy, even in this case emotions have a sort of "indexal" quality.
.......................................... ..........................................
> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jim Piat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > To: "Peirce Discussion Forum" <peirce-l@lyris.ttu.edu <mailto:peirce-l@lyris.ttu.edu>> > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2006 2:17 PM > Subject: [peirce-l] Re: R: Re: R: Re: naming definite individuals > > >> > >>> I was meditating that actually the most mechanical emotions >>> may be thought as material relationships via neuronal paths starting >>> from external stimulations up to conscious appraisal. Thus, your >>> defintion of index is applicable to emotions, or at least to the >>> emotions p
.......................................... ..........................................
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--Boundary_(ID_KV1+FspCP9XngmiSRn7/Dw) Content-type: multipart/related; boundary="Boundary_(ID_8Q80E+f857RGlDOeZIdbaQ)" --Boundary_(ID_8Q80E+f857RGlDOeZIdbaQ) Content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <title></title> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Claudio and list,<br> I see that you are using the 3 registers from Lacan as examples(?) of the 3 Peirce's categories in your first nonagon. This would give: Imaginary -> Firstness, Real -> Secondness, Symbolic -> Thirdness. I am not sure at all that this is correct but the question of the possible relationships between both®Ý schemes is strongly worth .......................................... .......................................... At first sight it seems to me as quite arbitrary. For example, why not Jealousy a Form (as a kind of relationship)?<br> Thanks<br> Bernard<br> <br> Claudio Guerri a ®®crit®Ý: <blockquote cite="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" type="cite"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; "> <meta content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name="GENERATOR"> <style></style> <div>Giovanni, List</div> <div>®Ý</div> <div>I don't know if this can help...</div> <div>(I am not sure if the English translation of psycho terms is correct)</div> <div>Without entering the specific discussion I can (as always) show a graphic diagrammatic approach...</div> <div>It was an "enlightment" (or a darkening) after a psychoanalytic session.</div> <div>®Ý</div> <div><img alt="" src="cid:part1.06070606.09080400@iutc3.unicaen.fr" align="bottom" border="0" hspace="0"></div> <div>®Ý</div> <div>This "draft idea" is related with this diagram too.</div> <div>perhaps Althusser's approach to the triadic sign could be considered for emotions.</div> <div>This diagram (using the Semiotic Nonagon)®Ýtries to show the interrelation and "fluid"®Ýinterdependence between those three... which of them will be "dominant" in each given context...???</div> <div>®Ý</div> <div><img alt="" src="cid:part2.08070700.02090009@iutc3.unicaen.fr" align="botto --Boundary_(ID_8Q80E+f857RGlDOeZIdbaQ) Content-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-type: image/gif Content-transfer-encoding: base64 R0lGODlhxgHUAPcAAAAAAP///wAA/wIC/wYG/wkJ/w4O/xER/xYW/x4e/yIi/yws/zMz/zo6 /z09/0JC/0dH/01N/1JS/1lZ/11d/2Ji/2xs/3Fx/3V1/3p6/35+/4GB/4aG/4qK/42N/5GR /5WV/5qa/5+f/6Oj/6qq/62t/7Gx/7e3/729/8PD/8vL/9HR/9bW/9nZ/97e/+Li/+bm/+rq /+3t/+7u//Hx/6iosvT0//f3//j4//v7//39/7Gxsru7sn19eoSEg/8aGv8pKf82Nv9AQP9H R/9JSf9NTf9OTv9RUf9SUv9VVf9aWv9dXf9hYf9lZf9oaP9ra/9tbf9ubv9wcP9ycv91df94 eP97e/9/f/+Bgf+EhP+Ghv+IiP+Li/+Ojv+Skv+Vlf+YmP+bm/+dnf+hof+kpP+np/+oqP+r q/+trf+ysv+1tf+2tv+4uP+6uv+8vP++vv/AwP/Dw//Fxf/Hx//IyP/Kyv/Nzf/Pz//S0v/V 1f/Y2P/b2//d3f/h4f/m5v/q6v/s7P/u7v/w8P/y8v/19f/39//4+P/7+//9/f7+/v39/fr6 +vn5+ff39/X19fPz8/Dw8O7u7u3t7evr6+np6efn5+Xl5ePj4+Dg4N/f39zc3Nvb29nZ2dbW 1tXV1dLS0tHR0c/Pz83NzcrKysjIyMfHx8TExMLCwsDAwL6+vr29vbq6uri4uLe3t7S0tLKy srGxsa6urqysrKqqqqioqKampqWlpaKioqGhoZ6enp2dnZqampmZmZeXl5WVlZKSkpCQkI6O jo2NjYuLi4mJiYaGhoSEhIODg4CAgH9/f3x8fHp6enh4eHZ2dnR0dHJycnFxcW5ubm1tbWtr a2lpaWZmZmVlZWNjY2FhYV5eXlxcXFtbW1hYWFZWVlRUVFJSUlBQUE9PT01NTUpKSkhISEZG RkVFRUNDQ0FBQT8/Pz09PTk5OTY2NjQ0NDMzMzExMS8vLywsLCsrKykpKSYmJiUlJSMjIyEh IR4eHhkZGRISEg0NDQcHBwICAgEBAf///yH5BAEAAP8ALAAAAADGAdQAAAj/AAMIHEiwoMGD CBMqXMiwocOHECNKnEixosWLGDNq3Mixo8ePIEOKHEmypMmTKFOqXMmypcuXMGPKnEmzps2b OHPq3Mmzp8+fQIMKHUq0qNGjSJMqXcq0qdOnUKNKnUq1qtWrWLNq3cq1q9evYMOKHUu2rNm etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc.,. . .FOR ANOTHER 400 kB or so !!!!!!!! --- Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com
