Great question, Jim!  I can't even get started on an answer today, but I will be at work on it tomorrow and try to get at least a start at an anwer before the day is out. 
 
Joe  
 Oh thanks Joe.  I'm relieved to hear that!  Reflecting a bit more I see that I should have focused primarily on the triadic (standing for to) aspect of the sign and not the dyadic indexical (referential) aspect. But I'm glad you found my question worth addressing and I'm looking forward to your comments. 
 
Jim Piat
---
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to