Animated Logical Graphs • 17 https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2019/07/09/animated-logical-graphs-17/
All, To get a clearer view of the relation between primary arithmetic and primary algebra consider the following extremely simple algebraic expression: Figure 1. Cactus Graph (a) https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/box-a.jpg In this expression the variable name “a” appears as an operand name. In functional terms, “a” is called an argument name, but it’s best to avoid the potentially confusing connotations of the word argument here, since it also refers in logical discussions to a more or less specific pattern of reasoning. As we discussed, the algebraic variable name indicates the contemplated absence or presence of any arithmetic expression taking its place in the surrounding template, which expression is proxied well enough by its formal value, and of which values we know but two. Thus, the given algebraic expression varies between these two choices: Figure 2. Cactus Graph Set () , (()) https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/box-.jpg The above selection of arithmetic expressions is what it means to contemplate the absence or presence of the operand “a” in the algebraic expression “(a)”. But what would it mean to contemplate the absence or presence of the operator “( )” in the algebraic expression “(a)”? That is the question I’ll take up next. Regards, Jon
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with no subject, and with the sole line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
