Animated Logical Graphs • 20
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2019/07/11/animated-logical-graphs-20/
All,
Another tactic I tried by way of porting operator variables
into logical graphs and laws of form was to hollow out a leg
of Spencer Brown’s crosses, gnomons, markers, whatever you wish
to call them, as shown below.
Figure 1. Transitional Form (q)_p = {q,(q)}
https://inquiryintoinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2019/07/box-q-qua-p.jpg
The initial idea I had in mind was the same as before, that the
operator over q would be counted as absent when p evaluates to
a space and present when p evaluates to a cross.
However, much in the same way operators with a shade of negativity tend
to be more generative than the purely positive brand, it turned out more
useful to reverse this initial polarity of operation, letting the operator
over q be counted as absent when p evaluates to a cross and present when p
evaluates to a space.
So that is the convention I’ll adopt from this point on.
Regards,
Jon
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected]
with no subject, and with the sole line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of
the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
