Haig, Simons and Schanz, if you really want to know. Income is consumption plus the change in net worth. Obviously NIPA does it differently. mbs Max Sawicky wrote: >Any change >in wealth IS income. By what definition? Certainly not the NIPA definition. Doug
- Economics Reporting Review by Dean Baker, 5/21/01 Robert Naiman
- Keynesian economics 101 David Shemano
- Re: Keynesian economics 101 Jim Devine
- RE: Re: Keynesian economics 101 Max Sawicky
- Re: RE: Re: Keynesian economics 101 Jim Devine
- Re: RE: Re: Keynesian economics 101 Doug Henwood
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Keynesian econo... Max Sawicky
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Keynesian e... Doug Henwood
- RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Key... Max Sawicky
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re:... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Key... Jim Devine
- Vaporware Michael Perelman
- Re: Vaporware Doug Henwood
- monetary policy Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Vaporware Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Vaporware Doug Henwood
- Re: Vaporware Carrol Cox