>
>Now, as far as "unserious" contributions are concerned. MIM's Maoism was
>pretty anti-Marxist, but I have to say that he or she was basically
>saying the same sort of thing that Bill Mitchell has been saying about
>the French strike. It is a variant on SDS/Weathermen politics from the late
>60's. You know, white skin privilege and all that.
louis (author of the above) - please develop an argument rather than assertion
to tell me why the things i am saying about france are "pretty anti-Marxist"
and perhaps while you are at it, please develop a brief vision of what marxism
means in the 1990s rather than the 1950-60s.
i have to tell you in advance (and the others) that i see myself as a very
dedicated working class marxist - academic and activist.
kind regards
bill
--
#### ## William F. Mitchell
####### #### Head of Economics Department
################# University of Newcastle
#################### New South Wales, Australia
###################* E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
################### Phone: +61 49 215065
##### ## ### +61 49 215027
Fax: +61 49 216919
##
WWW Home Page: http://econ-www.newcastle.edu.au/~bill/billyhp.html
