Jim Devine wrote, > Why? because it awakens the public's interest in a fundamentally > meaningless process. Jim, What do you *mean* by a "fundamentally meaningless process"? Elections in the U.S. are fraught -- overladen -- with "meaning". Couldn't the problem be better stated as _too much meaning_ that has no ostensive referent? Tom Walker
- Re: Re: Slate News Timework Web
- Re: Re: Slate News Rod Hay
- Re: Re: Slate News Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Slate News Carrol Cox
- Fwd: SLATE NEWS Jim Devine