I am not arguing for ignorance, just due caution and civil protection.
Rod
Jim Devine wrote:
> At 03:21 PM 4/7/00 -0400, Rod wrote:
> >There is also the legal issue that people should be punished for their
> >behaviour, not for their "genetic predisposition" It is also easy to
> >imagine all sorts of discrimination by insurance companies, etc.
>
> right. That's the trouble with science. It's a good thing in general,
> something to be encouraged, but can always be used for ill rather than for
> good. But ignorance can also be used for good or ill.
>
> Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://liberalarts.lmu.edu/~jdevine
--
Rod Hay
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The History of Economic Thought Archive
http://socserv2.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/index.html
Batoche Books
http://Batoche.co-ltd.net/
52 Eby Street South
Kitchener, Ontario
N2G 3L1
Canada
