Charles Brown wrote: >CB: Wasn't GDP socio-politically constructed in order to hoodwink the people ? You channeling Chang? No it wasn't constructed to hoodwink the people. It was constructed to get a picture of the macroeconomy. Planning for WW II accelerated the process in the U.S., but national income accounting in general has a long history that has little to do with hoodwinking the people. Doug
- Re: Genderization Eric Nilsson
- Re: Re: Genderization Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Genderization Charles Brown
- Genderization Charles Brown
- Genderization Charles Brown
- Genderization Charles Brown
- Re: GDP Jim Devine
- Re: Re: GDP Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: GDP Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: GDP Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Genderization Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Genderization Stephen E Philion
- Re: Genderization Charles Brown
- Re: Genderization Doyle Saylor
- Re: Re: Genderization Charles Brown
- RE: Genderization Eric Nilsson
