Isn't it important to look at specific sectors of the economy rather than just the overall amount of foreign control? In the late sixties and early seventies there was a concerted effort by the left nationalists such as Watkins and Laxer to call attention to the degree of US and foreign control of the Canadian economy. It may very well be that the nationalist policies that developed as a result of the Watkins and Gray report and pressure by those such as the Wafflers in the NDP resulted in a decline in US and foreign ownership. What would be interesting would be to look at the relative changes in certain areas dominated by foreign control. For example what has happened in the following?:(from Rotstein INDEPENDENCE THE CANADIAN CHALLENGE Mclelland and Stewart 1972) Percentage of Non-Resident Ownership by: Assets Profits Petroleum and Coal 99.7 99.7 Chemicals 81.3 88.9 Tobacco 84.5 82.7 Obviously some key sectors are dominated by foreign ownership. This may have considerable policy effects. The National Energy programme for example has been completely gutted and would be impossible under the terms of NAFTA. I realise the data I use is more than 25 years old, but I would like to know what is the situation now in sectors such as I cite. While assets may be a reasonable measure of concentration of foreign ownership, other measures may be revealing as well. Take the pharmaceutical industry. This industry has been successful in lobbying for legislation that benefits TNC drug giants at the expense both of generic manufacturers and of our medicare programme. You surely are aware of some of this. It is not just a question of protecting Canadian generic manufacturers (or foreign ones) it is of assuring that TNC drug giants don't use patent protection to drive drug prices through the roof. Here is an illustration of the manner in which different measures give a vastly different picture. (Statistics Canada, 1969) COMPARISON OF PHARMACEUTICAL ESTABLISHMENTS OPERATING UNDER FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC CONTROL: (%age) (1969) Under Foreign Control Domestic Control US European Total Number of establishments 34.7 8 42.7 57.3 However a different measure gives a radically different picture: Number of production workers 61.2 10.5 71.7 28.5 or total employees 66.2 12.6 78.8 21.2 or value added from manufacturing 74.5 13.1 87.5 12.5 Surely it is these sorts of figures rather than gross percentages that give some idea what is coming down the line. Cheers, Ken Hanly P>S I agree that there is no reason to protect Cdn Capitalists just because they are Canadian. As even the gbourgeois Trudeau recognised he had to nationalise a large oil enterprise (PEtroCan) as part of a rational national energy programme. We need a similar significant state presence in drugs gas etc. Now Petro Can is gone and the very possibility of a national energy policy is threatened by the terms of NAFTA. THe MAI is just a further step towards assuring that people cannot use the state in ways not approved by international capital. Is this not the case? Burgess seems to rail against bourgeois nationalism and the national bourgeoisie. However, it is not the national bourgeoisie per se that the new policies are directed against it is directed against people adopting a national policy that would conflict with the interests of international capital. A national policy includes such things as using one's energy resources to serve the needs of one's citizens first and foremost and being able to charge others more if the demand is there or restricting export--all impossible for oil and gase resources under NAFTA if I understand it correctly. We now have such things as control of marketing such as the Canadian Wheat Board, marketing boards etc. but new rules and agreements attempt to dismantle them. National policies might involve subsidies if it were thought to be in the public interest etc. and protection from foreign imports etc.etc. But all this is being eroded. I hear nothing from Burgess about such matters or nationalisation. In fact nationalisation and taking into public ownership seems to be the last bloody thing the left ever talks about nowadays. A fucking disgrace. By the way Canadian farmers voted in favor of retaining monopoly marketing of barley just recently. Some light in the gloom.