Excellent! By the way, is the China vote a straight up and down vote or are other
things attached as in the WTO and NAFTA votes?
Martin Hart-Landsberg wrote:
> And what political implications should we draw from the fact that US
> capital is highly mobile, using China, among other places, as either off
> shore production locations or as a threat. Max notes that this mobility
> or threat of mobility has real consequences. I agree. So, should our
> movement attack China and mobilize to keep it out of the WTO or focus our
> attention on US capital and the logic of international capitalism. I
> think that the choice leads to very different kinds of campaigns and
> educational work.
>
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
