I think that what Martin argues below is similar to the arguments that
Bill Tabb made a few months ago in MR, right on the money.
Steve
>
> Martin Hart-Landsberg wrote:
>
> > And what political implications should we draw from the fact that US
> > capital is highly mobile, using China, among other places, as either off
> > shore production locations or as a threat. Max notes that this mobility
> > or threat of mobility has real consequences. I agree. So, should our
> > movement attack China and mobilize to keep it out of the WTO or focus our
> > attention on US capital and the logic of international capitalism. I
> > think that the choice leads to very different kinds of campaigns and
> > educational work.
> >
>
> --
> Michael Perelman
> Economics Department
> California State University
> Chico, CA 95929
>
> Tel. 530-898-5321
> E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
