The Los Angeles Times                   Sunday, September 21, 1997  
 
Europe:  
 
WITH TIMES TOUGH, FASCISM COMING BACK  
 
        By Martin A. Lee 
 
WASHINGTON -- An Italian wine company recently sparked an uproar  
when it introduced a new brand with a picture of Adolf Hitler on its label.  
The same company also produces bottles of wine featuring Benito 
Mussolini's picture. A marketing strategy that uses such images might be 
dismissed as a tasteless joke if not for the fact that a multifaceted neofascist  
revival has gained alarming momentum in Europe since the end of the Cold  
War.  
 
The revival is not orchestrated by a sieg-heiling dictator flanked by men in  
brown shirts and swastika armbands. Rather, a new breed of right-wing  
extremists have trimmed their sails to suit the political moment. Realizing  
that the fascist game can be played in many ways, the more sophisticated  
tacticians underwent an ideological face-lift and mainstreamed their 
message for the sake of democratic appearances.  
 
The end of the bipolar Yalta system demagnetized everybody's compass  
and provided fresh opportunities for the Front National in France, the  
Austrian Freedom Party, Italy's National Alliance, Vlaams Blok in Belgium  
and other right-wing extremist parties that have successfully tapped into  
widespread post-Cold-War uncertainties. The rise of these mass-based  
electoral movements has coincided with a dramatic increase in hate crimes  
throughout Western Europe, where a racial assault occurs once every three  
minutes, according to the European Parliament.  
 
Peddling a ready-made politics for the economically disenchanted, far-right  
demagogues have touched a raw nerve by deceptively linking jobless 
statistics to the number of guest workers and asylum seekers in their 
countries. The presence of 20 million migrants in Western Europe is 
perhaps the most visible sign of the major structural transformation that has 
accompanied the emergence of a global economy, with its interdependent 
markets, unfettered capital mobility and novel information technologies. 
Third World and Eastern European immigrants are routinely depicted as a 
threat to national identity, as well as economic stability, at a time when the 
Western European work force is reeling from high unemployment, 
stagnating wages and cutbacks in social services. 
 
Neofascists posing as national populists have gained at the ballot box by  
coupling their anti-immigrant message with harsh denunciations of the  
1991 Maastricht Treaty and its plans for a common European currency.  
They have also benefited from foraging on a political terrain where the  
ideological distance between the mainstream parties has shrunk. This has  
propelled the growth of the extreme right, which appeals to disillusioned  
voters by assuming the mantle of the opposition and attacking a corrupt,  
bipartisan status quo. 
 
Lacking new ideas and eager to deflect attention from their own policy  
failures, mainstream politicians throughout Western Europe have been all  
too willing to fix the blame for complex social and economic problems on  
immigrants. Government officials mouthed neofascist catch-phrases that  
put the onus on foreigners for crime, drugs, job scarcity and nearly every  
other difficulty. Before long, it was politically correct even among socialists  
to speak of an invasion of foul-smelling aliens. 
 
But this imitative response did not lessen the appeal of far-right candidates;  
instead, it served to legitimize many of their ideas in the public mind. By  
jumping on the xenophobic bandwagon, mainstream politicians incited an  
atmosphere of racial hatred, which opened the door even more for the  
jackals of the far right. The growing popularity of radical right-wingers  
forced mainstream parties to adjust their policies to stop the hemorrhaging  
of their electoral base. As a result, government officials in one country after  
the next removed the welcome mat for refugees and adopted other 
extreme-right policy measures. 
 
In Austria, the ruling coalition tried to steal the thunder of Joerg Haider's  
Freedom Party by imposing sharp restrictions on immigration. But Haider  
still gained credibility. In October 1996, his party won 27.6% of the 
national vote, only a shade behind the two mainstream parties. Haider, who  
recently claimed that all soldiers in World War II, whichever side they were  
on, fought for peace, is poised for a serious run for chancellor. 
 
In France, mainstream leaders kowtowed to Jean-Marie Le Pen's up-and- 
coming National Front. In 1994, the French National Assembly, hoping to  
take the wind out of Le Pen's sails, reversed a law that granted citizenship  
to anyone born on French soil; henceforth, the privilege of bloodline would  
supersede all other factors in determining whether someone is a French 
national. But Le Pen's party continued to expand its base of support, 
grabbing  
3.7 million votes in recent legislative elections that saw the pendulum move  
from conservative to socialist after swinging dramatically the other way a  
few years ago. 
 
Gianfranco Fini's National Alliance commands roughly 15% of the 
electorate in Italy. His breakthrough came in 1994, when his neofascist 
party was given five ministerial posts and several other key assignments in 
a short-lived coalition government headed by billionaire media tycoon 
Silvio Berlusconi. This broke a long-standing antifascist taboo and 
established a precedent for conservative politicians, who had previously 
shunned alliances with the ultraright. Several public opinion polls indicate 
that Fini is currently Italy's most popular politician. 
 
In Germany, the ruling Christian Democratic Union (CDU) has been able  
to buck the trend and successfully defang its neofascist opponents. In 
effect, the CDU became what it set out to destroy. In addition to passing  
tough anti-immigrant legislation, top CDU officials routinely talk of  
"Middle Germany" when referring to what had previously been Communist  
East Germany. Germany's federal budget also describes former East 
Germany as "Mitteldeutschlands," thereby lending credence to neo-Nazi 
revanchists who insist that parts of Poland and the Czech Republic 
rightfully belong to Germany. 
 
By mimicking the language of the far right as part of their calculated 
attempt to stay in power, German leaders have perpetuated long-range  
problems that make the future appearance of a more virulent strain of 
nationalism likely. With unemployment officially above 12% (the highest  
since Hitler), discontent is rife. "A lot of people think that the increasingly  
difficult problems can be managed only with authoritarian means," says  
psychologist Horst-Eberhard Richter, as if an open society can't manage  
capitalism, and only a hard hand and an iron broom will work." 
 
Although there are definite parallels to the interwar years, today's neofas- 
cist movements have emerged under a unique set of circumstances. 
Ironically, their success has hinged to a great extent on their ability to 
distance themselves from the historical image of fascism. While some small, 
marginalized neo-Nazi groups still cling to the heritage of the Third Reich 
and the Mussolini regime, the more astute fascist strategists understand 
that it is best not to advertise their fidelity to the creed. Thus Le Pen, who  
founded the Front National 25 years ago while selling recordings of Hitler's  
speeches, insists that his movement has nothing to do with fascism, which  
he dismisses as an antiquated Italian doctrine. Fini calls himself a "post- 
fascist." Similarly, Xavier Buisseret, formerly the editor of a Holocaust- 
denial journal and the leader of a Flemish terrorist organization that was  
banned by the Belgian government, tried to moderate his image when he  
became the propaganda chief of Vlaams Blok, which is currently the 
biggest vote getter in Antwerp, Belgium's second largest city. 
 
Fascism is on the march again. No simple formula, however, can predict  
how strong contemporary fascist movements or their functional equivalents  
will become. "It is only a matter of time," predicts historian Paul Johnson,  
"before the fascism of the 1990s, under new names, of course, and 
'responsible' leaders, becomes respectable." That time may already have 
arrived.  
 
                                ===== 
Martin A. Lee is author of "The Beast Reawakens," a book about 
neofascism.


Reply via email to